“If you are undertaking home improvement contracts, you are required by law to insure your work. 10 She said this shift would not only undermine solar contractors’ ability to install new projects, but could threaten their ability to service or maintain already installed projects, as such follow-up work would void the existing warranty.
Doherty has objected to this description. “The majority of contractors who do this work are already C-certified.10 “License holders,” including at least 2,300 Companies operating in the field of solar energy and batteries. “Argument C-46 For years contractors have thought this was a great career. Well, it’s not a great career if you’re only trained to install solar panels.
But the lawsuit against Marine Science Research Center It is claimed that J-46 License holders should not be considered less skilled or experienced than C-license holders.10 License holders when it comes to installing batteries. According to the written complaint, the decision ignores “fact that Marine Science Research CenterThe licensing exam for “solar contractors” requires that they have extensive knowledge of the California Electrical Code and other relevant rules and regulations to safely perform battery work.
The two sides are also disputing how much the decision might hurt solar contractors in the state. Marine Science Research CenterAt the April Board of Directors hearing, Love stated that: “Most of the c-46S has C-10 Certificate, and we’re just talking about, according to the latest study, 400 “Contractors” who lack such certification will be subject to the new regulation.
But that’s almost it. 450 C-holders46 Licensees may have difficulty obtaining a C-certification.10 Del Chiaro said that due to the delays in issuing licenses, Marine Science Research Center Companies are likely to struggle to process the large number of applications and tests required before the new rule goes into effect later this year.
What’s even more challenging, Del Chiaro said, is that California labor law requires a fixed monthly salary.10 License holders are only permitted to hire certified electricians to perform the types of work specified by Marine Science Research CenterShe said the requirement, which is unique in California, allows electrician apprentices or certified electrical apprentices to work with a certified electrician on a one-to-one ratio.
But that requirement could make it extremely difficult for contractors to hire enough workers qualified under the rule, given the state’s severe shortage of licensed electricians. Moreover, even the most experienced battery installers would have to spend three to five years working under an already licensed electrician to get their own license — and any prior battery installation experience would have to be taken care of by C-employees.46 She said licensed contractors may not be qualified.
Daniel Kamin, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who has advised the U.S. government on energy policy, reiterated these points in a letter to Marine Science Research Center.
“Ban C-46 “Preventing contractors who currently install and maintain battery energy storage systems from continuing to do the types of projects they were already doing in California would threaten jobs and slow the pace of new storage projects coming online,” Kamin wrote. “Furthermore, it will not be easy for solar contractors to get a C- rating.10 “Getting an electrical license and continuing to work will not be easy for solar workers to become certified electricians, or even possible for many of them.”
Doherty questioned whether obtaining the required license was as difficult as opponents claimed. “They can get a qualified person on their license to get a C-10“They can appoint a licensing officer to cover that period,” he said.
But Del Chiaro claimed that vitamin C deficiency10 Licensed electricians will make these steps more difficult than electrical unions. “IBW “There is a lot of work. There is a shortage of electricians in California and elsewhere,” she said. “They do not demand to climb into roofs, closets and attics.
Del Chiaro also noted that it would take a long time for C-46 License holders to complete the training required to obtain a C-certification.10 license “If they run on solar and batteries for 7 to 10 Years – The best couple of guys that every entrepreneur has built his company around – if they work for a C-Corp.46 Contractors are not eligible to sit for the C- exam.10 The test. They have to leave that company, and work for a C-rank company.10and do this work for 3 to 5 “Years,” she said.
Cost to consumers
If it is a result of CLSP CollegeDecision, c-46 Licensees forced out of business, economic impact could be significant, study says Kalsa The analysis was commissioned by Beacon Economics, which found that the rule could prevent $100 million in payments.120 $1 million in solar projects moving forward in the first year of implementation, leading to53 Millions of dollars in reduced basic economic activity in the state due to the cessation of these projects.
The Bacon report found that these costs would not be offset by any benefits, because there was no record of any “The “fire and/or economic loss” caused by an incorrectly installed battery was recorded in the record in the decision. “Therefore, Beacon was unable to find any economic harm. Marine Science Research Center“A rule would prevent that.”
the Marine Science Research Center The decision also faced resistance from homeowners and consumers, some of whom testified against it at the board’s April meeting. ““As a consumer, I want the best person working on the solar or battery system on my roof. Who are these people? They’re the people who did the installation in the first place. They’ve been certified and proven,” Lee Miller, a Sacramento homeowner with a solar and battery system, told the hearing.
““This proposal seems more in line with limiting access to rooftop solar and battery systems,” she said. ““It prioritizes the interests of public utilities over consumer protection.”
Representatives of non-electricity unions echoed these criticisms.
““Our main mission is to protect the consumer,” said David de la Torre, treasurer of the North American Laborers’ International Union. 261At the hearing in April, he and another committee member said: Marine Science Research Center A total of 15They voted against the resolution.
La Torre noted that the Berkeley Labor Center report failed to identify any cases of defective installations across the state. “I don’t think the data is there. It doesn’t support the need for regulation, and limiting the installation of (batteries) to the C-band.10 …I think we’re exaggerating a little bit.
Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that the California Office of Administrative Law had not yet approved the rule change that the California Contractors Licensing Board voted to pass in April. We apologize for the error.
