The study shows more EV claims, and the high reform costs
This article may contain subordinate links.
summary
A study of 2024, which was reviewed by the 2024 peer, found that EV drivers had more calls in the accident. The same study did not see any statistically significant increase for the hybrid after full modeling. EV reforms cost more on average, adding financial risks even for minor collisions. Main meals: EVS appears a small but real claim in the claim; Training and technology can help.
Yes – a large study reports of peers that peers have reviewed that the electric car drivers (EV) are slightly vulnerable to being a mistake in the accidents of gasoline drivers. The researchers analyzed 125 million commercial trips from 14,642 cars in the Netherlands and match the insurance claims. They found that EVS had about 4 % claims of admission from the ICE internal vehicles (ICE), while the hybrid did not show any statistically significant increase after modeling. EV reforms were also 6.7 % on average. These results are important for safety policy, drivers training and insurance costs.
What is this EV crash study and what is the measure?
It is an open paper 2024 in accident analysis and prevention of the University of Limrek and Universitat de Barcelona. I compared EVS, hybrid and ice vehicles using Telematics (CAR sensor data) as well as insurance records and modeling of “calling in length” (when the responsible driver is judged). EVS showed the highest exposure of a climate despite driving less than miles; The hybrid is not yet higher.
University of Limerick (Research Lead) and Lero, Research Ireland Software (Data/Analysis) Center. Universitat de Barcelona (participating authors). Analysis and prevention analysis (Elsevier Journal, November 2024 Issue).
How did the researchers study whether EV drivers are causing more accidents?
Use a three -sections approach:
Data: 125 million trips from 14642 Trading fleet vehicles (January – October 2022, Netherlands) in addition to identical insurance claims. Modeling: Logistical slope to estimate the possibility of AT -LAULT demand according to the type of car after controlling driver and trip factors. Behavior measures: The Timino material showed that EV and Hybrid drivers have recorded harsh events (solid brake, quick acceleration, speed) from ICE – still has more claims.
Introducing box
EV: an electrical battery vehicle. HYBRID (HYB): It combines the internal equation engine with an electric motor. Ice: Internet -Combustion Engine Ope. Telematics: Sent devices on the ship that records driving behavior (speed, braking, acceleration). AT -FAlt: The insurance claim where the driver is responsible for damage.
Why can EV drivers be often wrong?
The most important point: the study shows the relationship, not one reason. Several reasonable factors appear in literature:
Driving dynamics. Immediate torque and one renewable brake can surprise the two drivers, leading to more rear collisions from EVS and different reaction patterns. Observing industry analyzes may be EVS often background, and perhaps due to the unexpected slowdown features. A quiet process around people on foot. Previous research in the UK found that EVS and hybrids were more likely to hit pedestrians for every mile in cities, indicating that hearing plays a role at low speeds. (Most of the latest EVS now includes low -speed mandatory noise.) New learning curve. Switching the type of car can change behavior; The 2024 paper noticed different remote patterns after drivers moved to EVS or hybrid, although “harsh events” fell.
In short, it can add multiple small factors – even when more smooth EV drivers appear – investigators can happen. In the event of this, it is advised to request legal aid from a reliable professional, such as a car accident in Houston lawyer.
What does the study say about the costs of reform and insurance?
Reform costs: EVS showed a significant cost of 6.7 % of Ice ice from ICE in study insurance data. The broader market data: US claim sources inform that EV collision costs about 15-20 % more than similar gas compounds, due to the battery, parts and procedures – installment evaluation.
Explanation statistics
+4 %: AT -FAULT claim for EVS VS ICE in a study of 2024.14,642 vehicles, 125 million trips: the size and scope of the data set. +6.7 %: EvS repair cost in the claim data.
How does this affect the policy of safety and daily leadership?
The policy is transformed towards technology that reduces accidents or about EVS and all cars:
The automatic emergency brakes (AEB) will be asked for almost all new American passengers by 2029, with the addition of updated government safety classifications and the addition of pedestrian tests and driver tests. Organizers already impose an EVS low -speed sound to help infantry detect quiet cars. Infantry risk research shows longer front ends (common on SUVs and reception) that increase the risk of a certain speed – separated from EVS, but mixed traffic key.
As discussed, the matching technology, training and design can narrow the gap.
EV against gas cars: What are the main differences in the risk of breakdown?
Comparative snapshot (study and industry data)
AT – FAULT Print Asselihood: EVS +4 % against ICE; The hybrid is not higher than statistical terms after full modeling. Average number of kilometers: led EVS and hybrids less miles away from ice in the data set. Driver behavior measures: EVS/hybrids had less harsh events than ice. Reform costs: EV +6.7 % in the study; American market reports ~ 15-20 % higher on average. Infantry Reactions: Previous research links EVS/HYBRIDS with high infantry disruption rates for each mile in urban environments; The designated sound aims to reduce this.
When to use each
EV: Wonderful to reduce operating costs and smooth torque; Plan for the learning period and the complexity of higher reform. Ice: familiar dynamics; Average repair costs; Upper tail emissions.
What are the best practices for the leadership of EV more?
Step 1: Learn the behavior of your car regret
Practicing one driving in the trivial low areas; Leave an additional additional distance to avoid the sudden slowdown of others behind you.
Step 2: The acceleration calibration
EV torque is a moment. Roll over the pedal instead of overcoming it when combining or running traffic.
Step 3: Improving Advanced Driver -ASSIST
Keep the discovery of AB and pedestrians; Program update; Understanding alerts and borders. The US bases will make standard AEB, so get used to them now.
Step 4: Low -speed mind areas
Your EV is calm. Survey of pedestrians and bikers in parking lots and city streets. The low -speed sound helps, but you still need a clear eye connection and a slower approach.
Step 5: Update training after switching the power engine
If you move from ICE to EV, try a short skills session with a local coach; Treat it like leading a new platform.
Common mistakes to avoid
The tail while using a powerful Regene; It calls for back confusion behind you. Excessive driver – assistant; These systems reduce the risks, but they are not in mind. Ignore low -speed pedestrians because the car “feels” is slow; Quiet EVS is still surprising people. Skipping software updates; Many safety features improve over time.
Main meals
The main difference is a modest but real increase in Faut for EVS against ICE in a large study 2024. The hybrid did not show a statistical significance after modeling. EVS had less harsh driving events, so Telematics does not guarantee smoother alone. Reform costs are higher for EVS, and the effect on insurance and ownership mathematics. Best practices suggest targeted training and smart use of safety technology to fill the gap. The post is EV drivers more likely to cause accidents? He appeared for the first time on the report of the clean fleet.
